Integration of Validity, Reliability, Trustworthiness, and Authenticity Concepts in Maintaining the Quality of Scientific Research

Herina Yanti; Gebi Sintia Dwi; Vebionita Megi Putri; Zulfani Zulfani

doi:10.31869/jkpu.v8i2.7403

Integration of Validity, Reliability, Trustworthiness, and Authenticity Concepts in Maintaining the Quality of Scientific Research

Herina Yanti, Gebi Sintia Dwi, Vebionita Megi Putri, Zulfani Zulfani

Abstract

This study aims to integrate the concepts of validity, reliability, trustworthiness, and authenticity in maintaining the quality of scientific research in both quantitative and qualitative approaches. These four concepts play a crucial role in ensuring the accuracy, consistency, credibility, and originality of research findings. This study employs a library research method by analyzing various literatures related to research methodology. The results show that validity and reliability are fundamental in quantitative research to guarantee the precision and consistency of instruments, while trustworthiness and authenticity are essential in qualitative research to assess credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability, and the authenticity of participants’ experiences. The integration of these four concepts can be achieved through a mixed-methods approach that combines empirical strength with reflective depth to enhance both the accuracy and the honesty of data representation. In conclusion, validity, reliability, trustworthiness, and authenticity should not merely be seen as technical procedures but as ethical foundations to ensure the integrity and credibility of scientific research.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arifin. (2020). LANDASAN TEORI: Landasan Teori. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, 2(1), 275–276.

Azizah, N., & Chaimatusadiah. (2025). Uji Validitas dan Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Pemahaman Konsep Dasaar Aljabar. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(1), 6637–6643.

Buku ini di tulis oleh Dosen Universitas Medan Area Hak Cipta di Lindungi oleh Undang-Undang Telah di Deposit ke Repository UMA pada tanggal 27 Januari 2022. (2022).

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. SAGE Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.

MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603.

Machali, I. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif.

Norman, O., Stahl, A., & King, J. R. (n.d.). Memahami dan Menggunakan Kepercayaan dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. 26–28.

Rifka Alkhilyatul Ma’rifat, I Made Suraharta, I. I. J. (2024). No Title 済無No Title No Title No Title. 2, 306–312.

Soesana, A., Subakti, H., Salamun, S., Tasrim, I. W., Karwanto, K., Falani, I., Bukidz, D. P., & Pasaribu, A. N. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif.

Sugeng. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. In Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.

Suhirman, & Yusuf. (2019). Buku Penelitian Kuantitatif: Sebuah Panduan Praktis. In Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Mataram.

Supriadi, G. (2021). Statistik Penelitian Pendidikan, (Palangka Raya: UNY Press, 2021).

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Widodo, S., Festy, L., & Ode, A. La. (2023). Buku Ajar Metodologi Penelitian. In Cv Science Techno Direct.

Xiang, W. K. (2018). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title. مجلة اسيوط للدراسات البيئة, العدد الحا(1), 43. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/186602/PPAU0156-D.pdf?sequence=-1&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/equilibrium/article/view/1268/1127%0Ahttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/rae/v45n1/v45n1a08%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31869/jkpu.v8i2.7403